Get your head out of, um, the sand
Spot a Bug, Go to Jail
What kind of thanks is that? This reminds me of how the RIAA prefers to deal only in lawsuits, rather than admitting they have a security problem and fixing the technology. But this is worse, because the accused are only trying to help. I'm filing this under technology, fear, and ignorance.
On April 28, 2006, Eric McCarty was arraigned in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles. McCarty is a professional computer security consultant who noticed that there was a problem with the way the University of Southern California had constructed its web page for online applications. A database programming error allowed outsiders to obtain applicants' personal information, including Social Security numbers.
For proof, the man copied seven applicants' personal records and anonymously sent them to a reporter for SecurityFocus. The journalist notified the school, the school fixed the problem, and the reporter wrote an article about it.
The incident might have ended there, but didn't.
The school went through its server logs and easily traced the activity back to McCarty, who had made no attempt to hide his tracks. The FBI interviewed McCarty, who explained everything to the agents. Then the U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles charged the security expert with violating 18 U.S.C. 1030, the federal computer crime law.
What kind of thanks is that? This reminds me of how the RIAA prefers to deal only in lawsuits, rather than admitting they have a security problem and fixing the technology. But this is worse, because the accused are only trying to help. I'm filing this under technology, fear, and ignorance.
Comments